Acts of Violence and Brutality Illustrated in Jacksons...

From the beginning of time, human nature has lent itself to violence and brutality. You see evidence of this as you read the news, or watch television. You might have been, or will be, the victim of this dark side of human nature. Looking back to the children of Adam and Eve, Cain killed his brother, Abel, marking, as I heard in a theology class, what many theologies claim as â€Å"the paradigm for conflict and violence.† Throughout our readings in The Story and It’s Writer: An Introduction to Short Fiction, we have seen many episodes of violence and brutality, ranging from torment to ritualistic murder. What do these acts represent within each story? In examining â€Å"The Lottery† by Shirley Jackson, and comparing it to â€Å"Sweat† by Zora Neale†¦show more content†¦In comparing the acts of violence and what they represent in these two stories, I feel it’s important to summarize the events that lead up to the violence. Jackson’s â€Å"The Lottery† begins with a description of a clear and sunny day in June. The narrations describe the activities of the village residents, each activity done as cheerfully as if it were a town picnic, the same as the years prior. If you look closer into the description of the activities, and the character’s involved in them, you will see a division of gender that is stereotypical. The boys gathered stones, protecting the pile â€Å"against the raids of the other boys,† while the girls stood to the side, â€Å"talking amongst themselves† (365). This reminds me of the â€Å"boys will be boys† comments that our society has used to explain away the rowdiness of boys in contrast to the mild manners that most girls present with. The story moves on to describe the activities of the men and women, in much the same way. The men are standing around talking about â€Å"planting and rain, tractors and taxes† (365), these would be co nsidered men’s things in past and present society. The women â€Å"greeted one another and exchanged bits of gossip,† which is the image of women that society presents to us. Nothing in the activities, to this point, reveals the horrific scene that will play out in the end. The boys gathering stones, while significant to the brutality at the

Situation Evasion Free Essays

Situation evasion in Johnson Pharmaceuticals By:Course:College:professor:Date:There are different types of situation leadership models with each having its own set of clearly defined principals that govern it. For a management to choose which set to use it must be aware of the variables that internally exist in its organization; the work force and policies to follow. Even as this developments crop up the organizations must be careful to infringe the rights of the workers or breach any direction that was stipulated in their work contracts (Lindsay-2014). We will write a custom essay sample on Situation Evasion or any similar topic only for you Order Now External factors like new government policies and stiff competition from competitor organize also initiates the situation leadership skills protocol among its management. The status quo of how and when activities of an organization are done usually makes a sharp shift to keep up with the dynamics of the wakeup call. Organizations risk being shut down if they become non compliant to state regulatory laws or risk being kicked out of the business by competitors if they don’t keep up with the development pace. When and if a company is forced or willingly decides to initiate the situation leadership protocol, it must analyze the variables to enable it pick the most effective model. Among factors to consider is size of management board compared to size of normal employees, the relevant skills that the workforce posses and the motivation levels among its workforce. Before that the organization must prioritize the tasks it wants to do and write down specific timeframes for each, depending on the urgency the priorities must always be narrowed down to three for easy execution and assessment. This was the exact position the Johnson Pharmaceuticals was in a few years back when the food and drug agency (FDA) was all over their backs for it to comply with the new policies and standards of production. Johnson Pharmaceuticals has an array of companies that produce disease and curative drugs in addition to the other medical cosmetic products. Due to the urgency of the policies to be implemented, compliance of the new laws had to be made the top priority in all its vast industries by default. To be efficient and curb total market dominance by its competitors the company made customer satisfaction its second and last priority at that time. Every manager in the vast organization was tasked in choosing which situation model to deploy as each had company had different markets and a specific competitor to conquer. Failure to comply meant revocation of its ISO certificate and eventual closure and failure to curb competition would mean losing customers, being thrown out of business and eventual shut down. If the two courses were not prioritized at the same the tumbling down of the organization was as sure as death (Lindsay-2014). The variables in complying with the new FDA policies were not as diverse and daunting as the variables around customer satisfaction. Language of communication, delivery time, product uniqueness, consistency in delivery, perfection of services and quality product are among the universal variables around customer satisfaction topic. A complete analysis on them will draw a conclusion that most of them are external and efficiency would only be ascertained if the customer base is retained if not increase and if the management would get feedback from customer on their product and service delivery. Either way, the task had to be done. Question 1 The situational leadership style used by the CEO of company A was the DIRECTIVE style of situation handling. As explained in my introduction; a manager must take note of the job skills and motivation levels of his workforce. The work force in company A low amount of skills and low amount of motivation required for the task ahead. To counter this, the management had to deploy high motivation actions and high structuring actions (Lindsay-2014). The actions were meant to add more skills to the workforce and motivate it into doing the job. Here the CEO had to put his hands in the job to show his lot that the job can be done. The dynamics of this kind of situation model are that the management has to make all the policies and decisions; this is meant to reduce psychological pressure on the workforce. It has a single communication pathway where the workforce only report back to the management.The CEO of Company B used the DELEGATING style of situation management. This style is used when the workforce requires low amount of structuring and low amount of motivation skills. In this scenario the workforce is usually equipped with the basic skills on the job and there are high motivation levels among them. This is the simplest type of situation handling as the workforce is experienced and it knows what is required from them. The management usually makes the policies with the help of workers; assign specific instructions to them then the workers later communicate the progress up the management ladder. Question 2 The delegating style is deduced to have an advantage over the latter as there are fewer variables in it. Only praise for motivation is required to keep the spirits of the workforce (Lindsay-2014). If the two styles were used in a short timeline within the two companies then delegating would still take the day because experience reduces the timeline in which tasks are normally done. Question 3 It would be very surprising if the directing style outdid the delegating style in performance. This would mean that there was serious information breakdown on the information path and imply that there is a big managerial problem in company B. Other critics may argue that the workforce in directing style was eager learn and was responsive to the little motivation or many the management in it was more supporting than the workforce in delegating style (Lindsay-2014). Well, the statement may hold water but then likelihood of that is very low. References A book by Evans, J.R and Lindsay, W.M written in 2014,Managing for quality and performance (9th edition)Cengage learning. How to cite Situation Evasion, Papers

Corporations Act Empowerment Pty Ltd

Question: Discuss about the Corporations Act for Empowerment Pty Ltd. Answer: Introduction The statutory oppression remedy of the Corporations Act is provided within Part 2 F. 1 entailed in section 232. Section 232 permits the courts to allow members a wide variety of remedies. It also stipulates that a member has to show the company has conducted its affairs conversely to the members interest as a whole, oppressive, unfairly discriminatory or unfairly prejudicial. Can Desley apply for a remedy under section 232 A member, previous member or ASIC-approved individual can apply under for remedy under section 234. A member is allowable to make his application even where the oppression relates to the member in a capacity other than a member and or another member in his capacity as a member (Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon 2013). An individual can still apply even after being eliminated from the register of the member due to a selective capital decrease. A person who will stop being a member can as well apply where the oppression action links to the condition whereby they stop being members. An individual whom ASIC views appropriate having regard to its probe into the affairs of the company (Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon 2013). Applying the provision of section 232, Desley can apply for a remedy since he is a member. Also, he is permitted to apply since he will stop being a member since this oppression in action links to the condition whereby Desley will stop being a member. It is clearly stated that Desley intends to end her involvement with the Empowerment Pty Ltd. Moreover, it is clear that she is not only being oppressed by the company conducted itself contrary to her interest as a whole and oppressive but also further depressed due to her inability to sell her shares (Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon 2013). Did the conduct complained of happening within the course of the affairs of the company Section 53 defines the affairs of the company to include the companys formation, promotion, membership, profit and losses as well as trading activities. The affairs also entail companys internal management as well as proceedings and voting rights. Applying the above provisions to the fact, it is true that the conduct complained of happened within the course of the companys affair. For example, the conduct touches on profit and loss and trading activities (Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon 2013). The board conducted itself contrary to Desleys interest by awarding themselves an increment of $80,000 and increasing Abels pay and benefit by $70,000 in total discrimination of Desley. More badly, the board explicated in advice to the members, that all the profits will be retained for the next several years for the expansion of the business operation. This is clearly an unfairly prejudicial, unfairly discriminatory and oppressive to Desley. It is clear that all the other members accept Desley will benefit from the manner the board conducted itself. She is also oppressive since she has been denied an opportunity to sell her shares (Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon 2013). Does the conduct being complained of fit within the meaning of s232 The conduct fits within s232 since it is oppressive, unfairly discriminatory and unfairly prejudicial to Desley. This is because only Desley will not benefit from the new policies and she cannot as well be allowed to sell her shares. The decision is, therefore, oppressive in effect thereby breaching Desleys reasonable expectations (Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon 2013). It was, therefore, apparent that the board lacked wisdom, inefficient and carefulness (Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon 2013). There was also obvious unfairness and lack of probity towards Desley as one of the principal shareholders. The case of John J Starr PL v Robert R Andrew can be applied in this instance where the oppressive conduct of board meeting was affirmed and Thomas v HW Thomas Ltd is also relevant as it confirmed unfairly restriction of dividends. What orders cab the court make The court may issue a purchase of oppressive members (Desley) shares to solve the issue as well as regulation of the affairs of the Empowerment Pty Ltd (Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon 2013). References Hanrahan, P.F., Ramsay, I. and Stapledon, G.P., 2013. Commercial applications of company law. Commercial Applications Of Company Law, CCH Australia Ltd.